The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nja²⁴⁷ 10:00, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chelsea Korka[edit]

Chelsea Korka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable subject fails all 3 tests of WP:ENTERTAINER. Was deleted per AfD debate in 2007, but appears to have slipped back in through the cracks. (In fact, the article has been deleted 6 times previously.) I can't detect sufficient change in circumstance that would warrant inclusion now anymore than before. Jim Ward ^{(talk·stalk)} 03:27, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• This article has been repeatedly deleted and recreated. It needs to be deleted and salted. For that matter, its probably a csd eligible delete. 75.38.59.250 (talk) 05:02, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the nominator. One (talk) 05:44, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment The previous deletions were all in 2007 when her supposed notability was all still based on the TV show and a big crystal ball. Those concerns no longer apply. She finished second in a major televised competition and is part of what appears to be a notable band. The real question is whether reliable references can be found other than the fansite listed in the references. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:12, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Reply Little has changed since 2007 that affects the subject's notability, so those concerns do apply. She finished 2nd runner-up – another way of saying 3rd – in a televised competition in 2007; just how "major" is debatable and tangential. In fact, that was a subject of the 2007 article and of the first deletion debate. Now, she sings in a nightclub act. All of the references in the subject's article, as well as in the nightclub act's article, are self-published; none meet the reliable-source requirement. So, even looking at this in the most favorable light, nothing here approaches the bar for inclusion. Jim Ward ^{(talk·stalk)} 13:57, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and salt per the IP. Absolutely no notability even after things have changed in the two years since the last afd. No reliable sources whatsoever. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 18:03, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and salt No improvement since the last afd. As for the notability, a google search reveals nothing more than myspace pages and photos. The article has been deleted many times so it should be salted so it isn't recreated.Acebulf (talk) 21:10, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - a blip of coverage during her run in the reality TV and then nothing. -- Whpq (talk) 16:19, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This article is okay, I don't understand why are you gonna delete this article. This girl is in a group (Paradiso Girl), a serious group who has a single and a official website 96.21.20.97 (talk) 00:08, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and Salt. Unsuccessful TV game show contestant, who now sings in a group of extremely questionable notability. Given the repeated recreation, this should be salted. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 07:17, 17 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete and salt: Lankiveil has it right, and "questionable" doesn't begin to describe The Paradiso Girls. If that's her only claim to fame, she's doomed on Wikipedia, because the article on The Paradiso Girls just got deleted at AFD.—Kww(talk) 04:09, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.