The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus to delete following relisting. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 13:33, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cheley Camp

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertising piece that fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 11:08, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No real coverage in reliable sources, no actual assertion of notability (being "one of 46 Colorado camps accredited by the ACA" and noting that 9 million kids will attend all camps anywhere is lacking). If there was any real evidence of notability, the article's tone could perhaps be salvaged, but there's no there there.CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 06:46, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:03, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Nothing's really asserting notability of the camp itself here. Fails WP:GNG by itself. Red Phoenix ^{build the future...}_{remember the past...} 17:43, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree. Though the article's tone might be salvageable, its notability is dubious at best. At this point - speaking as someone who loves Cheley and has made attempts in the past to fix the article - it's probably not worth saving. HaiyaTheWin IS The Win! 00:41, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.