The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn as first commenter figured out that these were copied from existing articles, making them A10 speedies. Bearcat (talk) 19:16, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chart history 1995

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Two articles which list what I'm presuming are the #1 singles on a pop chart, but which completely fail to specify or source what pop chart they hit #1 on. This is a type of article that we do allow for certain notable charts that pass WP:CHARTS, if the information in them can be referenced as accurate -- but if the article is unsourced, and doesn't even contain enough context for us to determine whether the chart in question is a notable one or an individual radio station or a user's own self-created blogchart, then that's not an article we can keep. Delete, unless somebody can actually figure out what chart is involved here. Bearcat (talk) 18:54, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Super strong delete. It was taken from List of Billboard Hot 100 number-one singles of 1995 and List of Billboard Hot 100 number-one singles of 1996 without any attribution, per WP:CWW. (Some replacement with garbage entries in the 1996 article, like who's Nursey?) Even at that, the articles lack any context for the info shown in them. MPFitz1968 (talk) 19:05, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhhhh, thanks, barnstar for figuring that out. On that basis, accordingly, I'm going to withdraw this nomination and speedy them both as duplications of existing topics. Bearcat (talk) 19:16, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.