- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of English cricketers (1787–1825). Liz Read! Talk! 05:33, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Charles Andrew (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
not notable, made just 6 appearances in cricket matches 200 years ago, nothing else is known Artem.G (talk) 08:55, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cricket, and England. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:31, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Probably Redirect to List of English cricketers (1787–1825). I can't find anything else here, although I seem to recall there are Sussex sources from the earlyish 19th century - but I don't have access. The redirect can always be switched back if sources do appear. Blue Square Thing (talk) 13:04, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete we know nothing about him more than what can be put in a sports table.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:48, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to List of English cricketers (1787–1825) The subject obviously played a few matches a while back, and while finding sources from this period can be tricky, it seems likely that he probably doesn't pass GNG. Redirect is an obvious WP:ATD in this situation as BST says, as if something of GNG not does come up, it can be switched back. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:18, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to List of English cricketers (1787–1825) per BST and RF22. Could be nothing more than a name on six scorecards and do we know if the six matches were all first-class? The fact that he lived 200 years ago is completely irrelevant but it does highlight the likelihood that sources will not easily be found. NGS Shakin' All Over 22:24, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per the above, retaining categories. It has to be said, whether a cricketer played yesterday or 200 years ago is completely irrelevant. StickyWicket (talk) 09:38, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG, and their name is too common for a redirect to be suitable here - Charlie Andrew, officially Charles Andrew, exists, as do notable individuals with similar names, such as Charles Andrews, Charles Andrew Whitney, Charles Andrew MacGillivary, Charles Andrew Bothwell, Charles Andrew Bruce, Charles Andrew Muecke, Charles Andrew Myers, etc. BilledMammal (talk) 10:19, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- sounds like a need for a dab then Blue Square Thing (talk) 10:38, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- No objection to making this a dab page. BilledMammal (talk) 17:14, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Happy for this to be converted to a DAB page, with a link to List of English cricketers (1787–1825) on there for this person. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 11:30, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Permastub that fails GNG. Avilich (talk) 15:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - simple failure of any WP:N. Springnuts (talk) 08:28, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 09:49, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.