Hi @Artem.G: Thank you for being an active editor. Also thank you for adding the {notability} notability template that gently reminds me that my article needs more resources to pass WP:GNG. I added a few more. Now, I think nearly every source talks about the subject in a lot of detail and I believe it passes GNG and specifically it passes WP:AUTHOR. Can you kindly look over the sources, and if you agree, kindly remove the template you added. Thank you in advance. --PaulPachad (talk) 20:00, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Artem.G! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! JarrahTree 00:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dkrjaj2021 (talk) 15:00, 22 May 2022 (UTC) I've made the recommendations to add sources to the following sections in addition to the title. Ready for posting. Thank you, Artem G!Reply[reply]

I noticed that you added the following shortcuts to: Benjamin Rabenorolahy

Hell ! There are 6 sources (!!!) citing that short article. I do not understand 'why' you added "this article needs sources". I consider you edit as spam. If you do not understand the sources, or do not have them available, please keep off from comments. Regards I'm so tired (talk) 03:16, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have removed the ((proposed deletion/dated)) tag from Tahiry Mosa, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, proposed deletion is disallowed on articles that have previously been de-prodded, even by the page's creator, or which have previously been listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the ((proposed deletion)) template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Proposed deletions of several politicians

Hello, I notice that you have proposed the deletion of the articles for several Malagasy politicians. The proposals include several members of the Senate with the rationale, "This person is just a member of a political party." This is not only counterfactual, it goes against Wikipedia notability guidelines for inclusion. Please review Wikipedia notability guidelines, especially WP:POLITICIAN before continuing. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I came here to say exactly the same thing - I don't have time today to remove all of these unjustified WP:PROD tags, but as you had time to add them I hope you have time to remove them too. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:50, 23 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Phil Bridger: @Gene93k: I understood your points but still think that I wasn't wrong to propose deletion. For example, here for René Razafiarison the only source is this link that goes to archive, but for another person - RAKOTOMAMONJY Jean Max. Here for Roland Ravatomanga the only source goes to the arhived page of RAJAONSON Bruno. Here for Jean André Soja the only source is a dead link. Here for Christophe Samuel the only source is to archive, and that name is not on the page. And almost the same is true for every of these articles. So, I still think that all these articles should be deeted, unless somebody wouldn't provide valid sources. Artem.G (talk) 05:50, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Dead links are a cleanup issue, and deletion is not cleanup. The recurring problem in these articles is reliance on ONE now-broken web site. This kind of deletion tagging to force a 7-day cleanup deadline is disruptive. Also, PROD is for uncontroversial deletions. Members of a parliament are not uncontroversial despite your assertion that the subjects lack significance. • Gene93k (talk) 07:03, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• @Gene93k: So, in your opinion, an article with just a name and one broken link that should verify that this person is a politician is ok? Or is it just a question that a reason I mention for deletion is different? In that case I can agree, I wasn't so sure about the rules. But anyway, in my opinion, if no new sources would be provided, all these articles should be deleted as stubs that lack ANY sources at all. Artem.G (talk) 08:37, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• I just fixed the Johanita Ndahimananjara page, which you tagged for deletion. The link that was still working was enough to show that the subject passes WP:POLITICIAN. Dead links are an ongoing maintenance issue. In most of the 30+ tagged articles, replacement references can be found. That's why dead links are generally considered eventually surmountable problems, and on Wikipedia eventually is soon enough. Wikipedia editors are expected to use common sense when applying policies and guidelines. If sourcing is a problem, first of all assume good faith. Again, the essential facts check out in most of the tagged articles I have gone over. Try to fix the problem or tag it for a another editor to find and fix. That's what maintenance tags are for. Deletion is the remedy of last resort. • Gene93k (talk) 10:08, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Despite your ProD rationale, officeholders at a certain level are notable for inclusion in Wikipedia per WP:POLITICIAN. It is Wikipedia's goal to cover all of them, MPs, cabinet ministers, high court judges, etc. They are considered notable because they govern, and significant reliable source coverage is presumed to be available eventually. • Gene93k (talk) 10:08, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• thanks for clarification, I will undo my deletion proposals. Sorry for that, I was really thinking that deletion of bad-sourced articles is a good idea. Artem.G (talk) 10:41, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! I wanted to thank you for adding information to the infobox at the Walt Whitman page. However, traditionally, we have kept infoboxes for writers very sparse and simple. There just isn't room to explicate and, as a result, any non-objective info there is too generalized to be worthwhile and has the potential to violate WP:NPOV and WP:OR. Please reconsider building these infoboxes any further, especially for articles which have already been recognized as good articles, like that of Whitman. Again, thank you for contributing. --Midnightdreary (talk) 15:00, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harold S. Shapiro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Aliza Greenblatt

added a link pointing to New York

Kotli Loharan East

added a link pointing to Jammu and Kashmir

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Kruhlaye, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:58, 31 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's a town, what refs should it contain? There hundreds of articles about cities, towns, and villages, that has even less text! Let's then move all of them to drafts, why just this one? Artem.G (talk) 06:52, 1 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Śviatapołk-Čaćviarcinski Manor, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:43, 7 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Śviatapołk-Čaćviarcinski Manor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:25, 7 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Against Empathy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Bloom.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 12 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

YouTube and Bethesda's website, which is a primary source, are not valid sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Starfield (video game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Starfield (video game), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 06:34, 24 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artem.G! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 06:34, 24 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

it was already fixed, you didn't need to make any edits Tommy has a great username (talk) 19:19, 29 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, I noticed at Talk:Everywhere at the End of Time/GA2 that you said you included refs when calculating the wordcounts you listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/July 2021. I'm pretty sure that's not the expected procedure. The Prosesize script that the backlog page says to use to calculate wordcount only reports a count for the body prose, so I'm not sure how you're even getting the larger figure. Colin M (talk) 00:41, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks, I'll check again! Maybe I wasn't attentive enough, I just googled some script and use it. Thanks for notice. Artem.G (talk) 05:29, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Artem,

you commented: not every Linux distributive is notable, it is not clear how this one is. And most of the refs are to someone's github pages or toDietPi themselves.

As we evaluate the number of active DietPi installations we come to a count of approx. 100 000 Linux systems running based on DietPi. See DietPi survey page. Do you think that this number is a notable amount to issue a Wikipedia article? I could also explain how we try to determine the active installations, if this is of interest.

The refs showing to DietPi based pages are 14 references, refs showing not to DietPi pages are 17 references. Could you give me a hint for a better distribution? How many "project external" links should be used compared to "project internal" ones?

Regards, StephanStS

IMO you should include something that demonstrate how DietPi stand out from all other linux-based OSs. Right now there is a general description of features, but it's not clear why should be notable? If it, f.e. is moat popular one for RaspPi, or was featured by some notable source, it can be considered notable. And I wouldn't review it next time, as I might be biased. Artem.G (talk) 15:39, 12 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Artem.G,

thank you very much for the hints in your comment. This helps to improve the article.

One additional question is, whether you could give a list of the expressions you mentioned with Neologisms so that I could change them to a better wording.

Regards, StephanStS

Thank you for reviewing and accepting 5 of my AFC submissions (List of Thor DM-18 Agena-A launches, List of Thor DM-18 Able launches, List of Thor DM-21 Agena-B launches, List of Delta 2 launches, and List of Thor-Agena launches)!

Hello! Thanks for reviewing Cyclone Felleng. Just a small note for future reviews: please make sure that the article isn't mostly copied from it's respective season article (in this case, 2012–13 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season), since sometimes this would make it eligible for A10. If it isn't qualified for A10, but is still an unattributed intrawiki copy, please provide attribution by making a dummy edit. Please also be careful with the contents of the draft. Its "See also" section contained exclusively "please add stuff", which wasn't resolved before being published to mainspace. Chlod (say hi!) 13:55, 12 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks! I never thought that the content can be copied from another wiki article, so I never checked. Artem.G (talk) 14:52, 12 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Pathfinder poststamp.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:13, 15 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Would you be interested in joining a WikiProject SpaceX? If you are, can you please make a WikiProject proposal for it (I as an IP, can not make the proposal cause I would be stopped when trying to create the proposal page). @Artem.G:

	Reviewer's barnstar
	This is a Reviewer's barnstar for review a lot of articles on Wikipedia (including 6 of my own. Starship SN20 (talk) 18:24, 20 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Artem.G. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Sojourner (rover) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 21:55, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Artem.G. During my c/e, I've marked the section "The Rover Team" as unreferenced because it names a lot of presumed living people. These need citing per WP:BLP even though the article is not primarily a BLP article. I also don't understand why for the names of the rover operators are given in small text beneath each section; if these are important they should be mentioned ans cited in text.

I also think there are too many images in the article. I suggest moving most of them to the gallery section and keep just the most relevant ones in the text. I'm not sure of the best way to deal with the large, panoramic images and the large image map near the bottom of the article. This is beyond the scope of copy-editing so I've left the structure intact. Anyway, good luck improving this interesting article and getting it to GA and FA status. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 21:55, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Baffle gab1978 (talk · contribs), thanks a lot for you work, the article became much more readable! You are probably right in all of your comments; i've commented the entire Rover Team section, though I'll try to find a reliable source for it. The names of Primary Investigators are given for all important experiments and instruments, I think it's important and helps to understand that some papers cited were written by the PI/developers of the instrument mentioned. Regarding images - I will look through them again, you are probably right, but it's a bit hard for me to remove them - images are really good IMO :) Thanks again, I hope the article is ready for GAN review now. Artem.G (talk) 06:11, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No problem, it's a subject that interests me so no bother at all. Good luck with the GA run. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 22:22, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cold Synagogue, Mogilev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 28 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Commonwealth armies and an Australian spy, Nick-D on the American Revolutionary War and RAAF mine laying Op-ed: RobDuch on United States coastal defenses

Hi, could you please add suitable sources (in the citation template) for the music items added. Thanks, Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:51, 9 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

done! Artem.G (talk) 11:10, 9 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sojourner (rover) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CactiStaccingCrane -- CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 07:01, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Sojourner (rover) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sojourner (rover) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CactiStaccingCrane -- CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 08:01, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		For your valued work in the July 2021 GAN Backlog Drive, which, in a single month, helped to reduce the backlog by nearly 50%. --Usernameunique (talk) 04:47, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australia and the UK in Iraq and Afghanistan Op-ed: Nick-D on writing about military procurement

The article Sojourner (rover) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sojourner (rover) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CactiStaccingCrane -- CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 10:21, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @Artem.G: None of that article that you just promoted is sourced correctly. I moved it to draft so the editor could take some time to edit and add sources. It violates WP:NOT as it is description of a product which is a manual. scope_creep^Talk 18:49, 8 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @Scope creep! in my opinion the article is not that bad, it seems to be not just a manual, but a concept used in an (influential) textbook. though I do agree that not enough sources are cited, but it can be improved by a broader community if it's not in a draft space. I would suggest to place all these concerns into talk page and maybe use {unsourced} tag, so people would see it, and somebody (maybe the main author) would probably improve refs.

but if you would draftify it again I wouldn't interfere and review it next time; there were no message on the talk page about any problems with sources or being a manual. Artem.G (talk) 20:03, 8 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I thought it would be obvious to anybody looking at it. It isn't 2008 anymore. The consensus is that article must be referenced, every sentence, if it is mainspace. See what somebody else makes of it. scope_creep^Talk 20:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Artem, Thank you very much for reviewing the article! Your comments were very useful. I've applied most of your suggestions (details in Talk:T2K_experiment/GA1) and renominated the article. Thanks, Batmann (talk) 09:57, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Batmann I look through the edits you've made, and everything looks good. Hope my comments were useful, and I think that your article will pass the review now. Artem.G (talk) 10:41, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Flying Bulgar Klezmer Band, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gypsy music.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Sojourner (rover) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Gwillhickers (talk) 19:07, 16 October 2021 (UTC) -- Gwillhickers (talk) 19:07, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

For the GA review of the space travel in sf article. If you enjoyed it, check out another of my GANs at Earth in science fiction. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 16:14, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Mars Pathfinder Presidential Panorama.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 17:36, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on British conscription and German warship raiders

On 27 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sojourner (rover), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first successful Mars rover, Sojourner (pictured), was named after the Civil War–era African-American abolitionist and women's rights advocate Sojourner Truth? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sojourner (rover). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sojourner (rover)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 12:02, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I reworded your revert of utility programs. Your justification seemed to suggest that any computer program could be a utility program. Whereas this seems true, the textbook I cited used "Utility Programs" as a section in the textbook. I reworded the article by taking out the job titles of those who may be executing utility programs. The textbook author used these titles, so that's how I originally wrote it.

Also, the good article reviewer said each section needs to be balanced. So, if you have a textbook that can add useful utility program information, then the article will benefit. Timhowardriley (talk) 19:28, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 3 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Belyana, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that belyanas (pictured) were giant disposable wooden ships used in the Volga region for timber rafting? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Belyana. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Belyana), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:02, 3 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 25,934 views (1080.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of November 2021—nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 05:17, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for writing this. I'm into boats, but had never heard of the idea of a disposable boat, let alone a Belyana. Very interesting article. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:31, 3 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@RoySmith: Thanks! I'd also never heard of disposable ships and belyanas before this September, when I saw one in a museum in Astrakhan, and found it fascinating. Artem.G (talk) 09:15, 7 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For writing a fascinating article, Belyana, my congratulations. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:01, 3 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Care to chat about [1]? There are lots of terms in this article for which the Russian word could be given, but it wouldn't be relevant. Your revert includes no edit summary so I don't know your reasoning. Retswerb (talk) 21:50, 6 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As it is a Russian ship, the terms in Russian are relevant. It can be useful if you care to check the sources in Russian and need to understand the term, without this you would be completely lost in a 1911 book where google translate wouldn't help. Artem.G (talk) 08:11, 7 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Currently the other places where Russian is used make sense - they follow on terms for which there is not a direct English equivalent. Giving the Russian word for "cabin" stands out as we already have a word for that. Retswerb (talk) 09:01, 7 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've got your point, but it's not the case. The Russian work казёнка does means 'cabin' or 'house', but I've never heard this word before, it's either old one or was used only for belyanas. I can spell kazenka instead of a cabin, but it was easier to use standard word (cabin) and give its translation from the sources. Do you think that a note would be more useful than a translation placed in the text? Artem.G (talk) 09:13, 7 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yep, a note is probably an excellent solution. Either way not a big deal, just something that stood out in the context of an excellent and fascinating article. Retswerb (talk) 00:21, 8 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks! I'll add a note a bit later. Artem.G (talk) 05:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Artem.G. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Impact events on Jupiter at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 12:00, 18 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Baffle gab1978: thanks a lot, you are great as always! Artem.G (talk) 12:03, 18 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Your submission of PrOP-M at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:56, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Artem, I've seen that you follow the Open AI page. I'm pretty sure you've heard about Greg Brockman. A few weeks ago I posted the draft but the situation is a bit difficult since the article has been deleted several times due to the lack of sources back to the time. Only because of your interest in the topic, I'd like to ask you if you could give any comment on the Greg Brockman Wiki article? Спасибо. С наилучшими пожеланиями, Katyborsh (talk) 10:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)katyborshReply[reply]

@Katyborsh: I've looked through your draft and it seems to be fine and sourced. The article was previously deleted in 2016, so now there are probably more coverage on Brockman. Artem.G (talk) 08:31, 20 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Artem.G: Thanks a lot! I've been debating with one of the guys who deleted it and he sounded very discouraging. So, do I understand it right that I just need to wait for the draft approval? Katyborsh (talk) 08:52, 20 November 2021 (UTC)katyborshReply[reply]

Yes, I think you just need to wait a little for somebody to review the draft.Artem.G (talk) 08:55, 20 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Artem.G,Please help this article too LICIACube. I saw you updated dart page and this page is a subsiduary of that only Chinakpradhan (talk) 17:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sure, will look through and ce a bit. Artem.G (talk) 17:35, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 23 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article PrOP-M, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Soviet rover PrOP-M (pictured) was intended to be the first rover on Mars in 1971, 26 years earlier than NASA's Sojourner? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/PrOP-M. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, PrOP-M), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 9,920 views (826.7 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of November 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 01:29, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for monitoring a lot of my (sometimes poor) edits! Your help is greatly appriciated! as no one edit SpaceX Starship for a while CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 02:01, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Canadian junior officers in World War II

On 1 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Time, Love, Memory, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jonathan Weiner explains in his book how Time, Love, [and] Memory became associated with specific fly genes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Time, Love, Memory. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Time, Love, Memory), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Precious

time, love, memory

Thank you for quality articles such as Time, Love, Memory, PrOP-M, Belyana and Sojourner (rover), for help with Russian, for quality reviewing, for adding infoboxes, navboxes and redirects, for accepting articles for creation, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2674 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:58, 1 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Thanks a lot, Gerda Arendt, I really appreciate it!

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Time, Love, Memory.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 4 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Franzisca Baruch, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Franzisca Baruch (pictured) designed several Hebrew fonts, the cover of the first Israeli passport, the emblem of Jerusalem, and the logo of the Ha'aretz newspaper, all while barely knowing Hebrew? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Franzisca Baruch. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Franzisca Baruch), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:02, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 14,938 views (622.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she?) 03:35, 5 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 7 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article One Hundred Ghost Stories, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in Hokusai's woodblock print series One Hundred Ghost Stories, there are only five prints? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/One Hundred Ghost Stories. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, One Hundred Ghost Stories), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Lyrics: 1956 to the Present, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Craig Brown.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Artem.G. Some years ago, I did some intensive editing at the above article. Your additions (made quite a time ago) are interesting; however, I find some rather puzzling. You've used some terms I'm unfamiliar with in an architectural or constructional context, in the first and last paragraphs of the subsection on Interior, per this linked change - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Borgund_Stave_Church&oldid=1014809806 - in particular, "pliers". Should this be "piers", perhaps, or "pillars"? If the spelling is correct, the term is obscure enough to warrant explanation. A couple of uses of "rod" could also be clarified in context; a "rod" in everyday usage tends to be a slender,usually lengthy object. Do drop me a line if you wish! Haploidavey (talk) 18:58, 10 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Haploidavey: you're right, this is a typo, that should be 'piers' of course. I try to catch my typos, though they slip away sometimes. Thanks for noticing! "rod" here should be something like "a thin straight bar, especially of wood or metal", please rephrase if you can put it clearer. Artem.G (talk) 19:33, 10 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Phew, thank all the dictionary godlings for that! I had quite a time of it trying to find the most appropriate English terminology for some of the Churches's interior and exterior structure, and when I saw "pliers" my brain initially froze, thinking that I really knew nothing about it and should withdraw with dignity while I had the chance. I think I'd call the rods "ties" as that seems to be their function, and ties aka rods are usually strong in compression and stretch but slighter than the things they tie together. Haploidavey (talk) 19:42, 10 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Artem.G, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 15:41, 18 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• @Joe Roe: thanks! And thanks for the links to raters, didn't know about such tools. Artem.G (talk) 15:44, 18 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Help evaluate the quality of the article. Thanks you. Zuyeca (talk) 09:17, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've never edited any sports-related article, so I think I'm not the best one to ask. Artem.G (talk) 09:19, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

For your expanison work on Chosei Kawakami! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 10:21, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I recently added a post to use Milky Way mass as a unit of measure for larger objects like other galaxies or quasars - not sure why you call it obscure. What's obscure is to measure mass of elephant size objects in terms of accurate mass of poppy seeds, just analogy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.127.41.165 (talk) 21:04, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I understand what you want to do, but to say that the mass of Milky Way equal to 1 Milky Way says nothing. If you want to compare mass some Galaxy ABC with that of the Milky Way, it can be done on the page about that galaxy. Right now it's like saying that the mass of an elephant is 1 elephant. And besides, it should be used by verified sources to be included, if it's not used in a professinal literature it's just wrong to be here. Artem.G (talk) 21:10, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My point is not about writing or saying one equals one. Idea is that ex-galactic objects should be measured in terms of unit sizes of the same class object, and in our case Milky Way would be candidate number one. Same way we have Me (mass of the Earth) and use it to measure other planets. Same way M0 (mass of the Sun) to measure relative mass of other stars. Now, point is, that other galaxies like Andromeda or IC 1101 have nothing todo with mass of Sun, its too far and too small, and why mass of a Sun is still in use as base to measure mass of galaxies 100 or 1000 times larger, its a flaw in a choice of SI standards. Also if you looking for true references, existing literature going wrong way with this, and has to be changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.127.41.165 (talk) 21:55, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If we had base unit of mass for ex-galactic objects, galaxy IC 1101 is ~1600 times mass of Milky Way, makes more sense than having ex trillion of sand grains to compare to. Also Sun mass will change faster than the mass of a Milky Way, unit of mass should be stable and based on the same objects class in question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.127.41.165 (talk) 22:10, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

World is not spinning around Earth nor the Sun, stars are not part of atmosphere, we are out of those dark ages and know better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.127.41.165 (talk) 23:47, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Franklin–Nashville campaign Review essay: Military History Wikiproject Coordinators' reading list

Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:17, 31 December 2021 (UTC).Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Impact events on Jupiter you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ComplexRational -- ComplexRational (talk) 21:41, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Franzisca Baruch you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:01, 3 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Franzisca Baruch you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Franzisca Baruch for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

For having the bravery to review my GA nomination of Bucky O'Hare. Given the fact that nominations went skywall following the start of the Wikicup, I really appreciate you taking the time to do this. Best of luck. 👨x🐱 (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 20:31, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Time, Love, Memory you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:21, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Time, Love, Memory you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Time, Love, Memory for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:21, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Impact events on Jupiter you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Impact events on Jupiter for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ComplexRational -- ComplexRational (talk) 20:21, 13 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article PrOP-M you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of RoySmith -- RoySmith (talk) 14:01, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article PrOP-M you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:PrOP-M for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of RoySmith -- RoySmith (talk) 18:01, 22 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Artem.G. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Dura-Europos church at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 08:54, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Baffle gab1978 Thanks a lot for a great copyediting! I was offline for a long time, so missed this. Artem.G (talk) 17:39, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 29 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Impact events on Jupiter, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jupiter is sometimes called a "cosmic vacuum cleaner" because of frequent impacts from asteroids and comets (example pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Impact events on Jupiter. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Impact events on Jupiter), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 12:02, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Australian Army in Somalia Review essay: Hog Farm on American Civil War sites in the South and Midwest

Hi, thanks for the GA, and welcome back to the land of the living. I'm on my last day of self-isolation after a bout of Covid as well. Really infectious. Be well. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:44, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks a lot! It's nice to be back :) Artem.G (talk) 17:21, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article PrOP-M you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:PrOP-M for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of RoySmith -- RoySmith (talk) 19:01, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template ((db-afc-move)) has been created - this template is similar to ((db-move)) when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Artem.G. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Dura-Europos at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Dhtwiki (talk) 07:14, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you so much for your assistance in adding English translations for the woodblock prints. The work was tough, but your help was sincerely appreciated. --Ph0kin (talk) 18:50, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D on World War II in Europe

Hi Artem.G, thanks for your feedback on my Draft:Heritage Collections Council page. I appreciate the feedback as I am new to the game. I've edited the page as per your suggestions and wikipedia guidance and request your consideration again. Thanks, AbsurdWhistle (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 07:38, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• SeaDood (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:YUMI (Your USB Multiboot Installer) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I do not quite understand. I believe these references are reliable, secondary, and independent. Would you be willing to help me find references that work?

SeaDood (talk) 18:17, 28 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

SeaDood I look through and, honestly, think that the subject is not notable and the sources don't show notability. If you think I'm wrong, you can, of course, re-submit that draft, so other editors can decide whether it qualifies for an article - I wouldn't interfere, as I'm almost never review any draft more than once to exclude bias. Artem.G (talk) 18:33, 28 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on Hitler as a military leader

I did not take my first GAN carefully and failed it. Now I am ready, but the reviewer could not continue the review. Would you mind taking the review again? If you can't, it is ok. Thanks. Keres🌕Luna ^edits! 15:34, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keresluna sorry, I somehow missed your message. I would be mostly offline for the next week or so, and, honestly, during the previous review I realized that my knowledge in chemistry is not enough to review such articles. You can post on WikiProject Chemistry or on GA talk page, and maybe look through the last several GA/FA-s in chemistry and ping someone knowledgeable. Artem.G (talk) 11:38, 16 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just looking at some of the recent AfD cases, it seems you are not carrying out WP:BEFORE ahead of raising nominations. I strongly advise you to do so. Also, you cannot give 200 years ago or some time ago as valid reasons for a perceived lack of notability. You nominated one guy who apparently, though no one has actually named the source, played in 30+ first-class cricket matches and so he is obviously notable and the article is a valid stub awaiting development. Hope this helps. NGS ^{Shakin' All Over} 21:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on military logistics and rebuilding Nagasaki

My friends and I ( @Nexinij914, @ChikaObi) have been working on that draft and we have added more content which should make the Article notable, please could you review it again.

Psss I don’t really know how the review process works on Wikipedia that why I am asking you.

Thank you for all you do!

Link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Aniebiet_Inyang_Ntui ElontheWikiEditor (talk) 04:54, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Asked at Teahouse and told that reviewers rarely review a draft a second time. It has been reviewed/declined a second time be a different reviewer. David notMD (talk) 09:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thankyou for nominating Hassan Dyamwale for deletion. It is good to see people trying to enforce our guidelines on Olympic notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:55, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Artem.G & John It took a bit of a deep dive (he appears to have gone by a middle name), but I found that Dyamwale later became a member of the National Assembly of Tanzania so he passes WP:NPOL. Best, GPL93 (talk) 22:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Working Man's Barnstar
	For reviewing at least 7 points worth of articles during the January 2022 GAN Backlog Drive, I hereby present you with this barnstar in my capacity as coordinator. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 03:55, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mamoré–Guaporé linguistic area, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jacaré and Jacutinga.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You left a message on your last GA review of computer program to ping you for another assessment. Well, I've nominated the article again here: Talk:Computer_program. Timhowardriley (talk) 20:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on a World War II summit and the American space program

Dear Arthem.G. please can you reconsider Science theatre (genre)? best, --HenriDuvent (talk) 06:44, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Great work! Mooonswimmer 22:02, 5 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article describes situation in 1965.Xx236 (talk) 08:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

So what? Once I'll find sources that discuss the subject after 1965, I'll expand article. Artem.G (talk) 09:56, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I'm Styyx. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Bequia English, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~Styyx^Talk? 19:45, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please ignore this message; I unreviewed it on accident. ~Styyx^Talk? 19:45, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 15 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article L'Œuf électrique, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Paul Arzens created the electric egg (pictured) in 1942, during the war in occupied Paris? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/L'Œuf électrique. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, L'Œuf électrique), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 15 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Congratulations on your win at the 2022 edition of the Core Contest. Please get in touch with me at karla.marte@wikimedia.org.uk to coordinate your prize. Thank you. Karla Marte(WMUK) (talk) 09:16, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at four recent works

I have completed a copy edit of the Asteroid article, as you requested a few months ago. I think it's ready now for another Good Article review. Please let me know if you request a review. I would be willing to help respond to improvements requested by the reviewer. Folklore1 (talk) 15:49, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Folklore1: Thanks a lot for the copyedit, everything looks great! I'm extremely busy right now with real life issues, so I wouldn't nominate the article to GA in the next month or so. Artem.G (talk) 21:15, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		Vital Barnstar
		Your work on asteroid – a Vital article – is and will be greatly appreciated by readers. A toast for a job well done. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 13:27, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I guess, your complete removal of a poorly written statement wasn't the best choice. While the phrase itself is obviously wrong, without it the surrounding logical construction falls apart. I suspect that what it was supposed to mean is that neutron stars can have their magnetic moment not aligned with the angular momentum, and thus their rotation produces a quickly rotating magnetic field responsible for pulsations, but this mechanism is impossible for black holes (not because they "do not have magnetic poles" but because their magnetic field is stationary). So it would be better to rewrite that phrase correctly (perhaps checking what the cited original sources actually say) instead of completely removing it... — Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 19:14, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are probably right, though I don't have necessary references to prove it. If you could rephrase it, and I think your understanding is correct, it would be great if you'll do it. If no, please revert my edit, though I'll try to reread that section and rewrite it later. (Though I can't promise it as I am really busy these days...) Artem.G (talk) 19:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I didn't find any direct statements in the cited sources, but there has been a discussion on the talk page preceding the insertion of that paragraph, unfortunately, from an anonymous editor. The argument that regular pulsations (with a well defined period) are linked to a rotating magnetic field makes sense and is appropriate to mention. But the reasoning about the no-hair theorem was wrong, even though the final conclusion (black holes can't support regular pulsations) is correct. So I rewrote that sentence to make it clear that the magnetic field must rotate and that this is impossible for black holes. — Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 19:33, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Falklands War artillery and Nick-D on the Battle of the Ruhr

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chad Gadya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Exodus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Artem.G, the link that you removed as being a dead link is available from the Internet Archive:

• "MUSA 19 - Florence Price - MUSA". sites.google.com. Archived from the original on 1 September 2013.

I invite you to review the instructions at WP:DEADREF, part of the citing sources content guideline. As this guideline states, Do not delete a citation merely because the URL is not working. Dead links should be repaired or replaced if possible. That text then continues with step-by-step instructions for searching for archival links.

One further note: when you do find an archival link for a dead link, you can use https://citer.toolforge.org/citer.fcgi to properly format all the parameters, although you may wish to remove or replace the date parameter if it has defaulted to the archive date. Peaceray (talk) 17:11, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your edit to Elhanan Leib Lewinsky has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. The material appears to be substantially taken from: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2020-11-13/ty-article-magazine/.premium/peaceful-and-arab-free-how-a-19th-century-jewish-merchant-envisioned-israel-in-2040/0000017f-defe-df9c-a17f-fefe4ac10000. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. BalinKingOfMoria (talk) 00:21, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

BalinKingOfMoria this was a properly attributed quote. I can agree that the quote was too long, but as it was properly attributed to a source, and inside a blockquote template, I don't agree that it is a copyright violation. Artem.G (talk) 06:40, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keeping in mind that I'm no expert on the matter, my understanding of WP:COPYQUOTE is that attribution is sufficient to avoid plagiarism, but that copyright can still be an issue if too much material is used verbatim. Fair use is often a grey area AFIAK, but my impression of the quote was that it was a pretty sizeable paragraph, and so better safe than sorry.

With that said, if you still disagree, let me know and I'd be happy to start a discussion at Wikipedia:Copyright_problems (hopefully someone more knowledgeable than me about Wikipedia policy can help). BalinKingOfMoria (talk) 06:50, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't really care if it would be removed from the article, I just think it's not the case of copyright violation. Artem.G (talk) 07:20, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Falklands War

Artem.G,

It is not appropriate for users to participate in bath-faith activity, which is obvious as you removed one of my image contributions immediately after I disagreed with you on an entirely separate talk page on an entirely separate Wikipedia article. I will be reverting your vandalism, please see to it that you do not target users' contributions in the future when they disagree with you. Camdoodlebop (talk) 19:03, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian military leadership and Nick-D on the First Crusade's Byzantine connection

Hello, Artem.G. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/TRAPPIST-1/archive2.
Message added 09:14, 9 October 2022 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Just in case you don't have pings enabled. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:14, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Today, there's only one photo there, but that may change, and who will then do the maintenance? -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:47, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gerda Arendt please feel free to revert me if you think it's needed! You are probably right in your reasoning, though I'm not a big fan of empty commons links. Artem.G (talk) 17:59, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Meet some of the project coordinators

On 5 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cape Grim Air Archive, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Cape Grim Air Archive in Tasmania has been collecting air samples for more than 40 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cape Grim Air Archive. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cape Grim Air Archive), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 5 November 2022 (UTC) Reply[reply]

November songs

Thank you for another good one! Opera and Advent choral music on my talk --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:51, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 7 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article HaSela haAdom, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Israeli song "HaSela haAdom", about illegal trips to Petra, was banned in Israel? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/HaSela haAdom. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, HaSela haAdom), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 5,606 views (467.2 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of November 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 03:14, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the 1991 Gulf War air campaign Op-ed: Meet some more of the coordinators

Hi, Artem.G! It's nice to make your acquaintance. I appreciate you periodically poking around the articles I create/update (sometimes in haste!) about lesser-known Finnish and Swedish composers. Madetoja's music really is quite wonderful, and I am so very glad to hear that it has made an impression on you. My preference is for the interpretations on Ondine by John Storgårds and the Helsinki Philharmonic Orchestra, but the Alba five-disc set by Arvo Volmer and the Oulu Symphony Orchestra is unbeatable in its exhaustive coverage. The Ostrobothnians, however (and surprisingly), can be hard to come by, because only Finlandia Records has produced commercial recordings. I own the interpretation by Jukka-Pekka Saraste and the Finnish Radio Symphony Orchestra, and it's lovely... although, not being a big opera fan myself, I prefer the suite that Madetoja excerpted (the same goes for Juha, and you can find two excerpted orchestral works from that opera courtesy of Volmer/Alba). I initially, with the invaluable help of jack-of-all-trades Finnusertop (talk · contribs), worked on Madetoja back in 2016, but I have been returning to his articles of late (as well as creating new ones for The Garden of Death and Kullervo) since I have learned some new tricks and improved as an editor since then. May I also recommend to you the music of Uuno Klami, Lars-Erik Larsson, and Dag Wirén? ~ Silence of Järvenpää 17:31, 19 November 2022 (UTC) PS: Sorry about the mix-up on the Toivo Kuula WL... I tend to bounce around pages as I edit, and so things are in various stages of not done, done, and done-done. :)Reply[reply]

Hey Silence of Järvenpää, thanks for nice message and recommendations! I'm not a big fan of opera, but I do like new music! I got really interested in Kalevala and Kalevala-related music after I saw this video of guys reading the poem [2]. I don't know Finnish, but it sound beautiful :) I read some of your Sibelius articles, and they are great - I'm (slowly) listening to his music, and will try Madetoja and others you've recommend. Klami sounds familiar, though I doubt I know any of his works, others are totally new for me! And thanks for your articles, it's always great such nice work on (obscured?, or, even, previously neglected) musicians and works. Artem.G (talk) 16:33, 20 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Appreciate your entry on Knud Lonberg-Holm but would like to point out that his name is mispelled a couple of times (not all). It should not have a "d" (Londberg-Holm). Thanks 2603:7000:DC3C:D48A:34C3:A4F7:A3FF:28F1 (talk) 18:18, 23 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

fixed, thanks! Artem.G (talk) 18:20, 23 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also at Wikipedia:Teahouse#Typo. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:28, 23 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at British Territorials in India Interview: On turning 200 (issues of the Bugle!) Review essay: Coordinators' 2022 reading list Op-ed: Meet some more of the coordinators

		The Invisible Barnstar
		For completing at least 3 points worth of reviews in the June 2022 GAN Backlog Drive, I hereby award you this barnstar in my capacity as coordinator. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:58, 23 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

1. Which of the statements that you reverted isn't backed by the cited historical map (these are two sheets of the same map) which clearly shows the historic municipal boundary?
2. Is https://www.nli.org.il/he/newspapers/ytlv/1949/01/15/01/article/6/ which includes both a map of changes, and their textual description, a source that's acceptable to you?

Crash48 (talk) 13:35, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Crash48 i didn't read it in detail, but at first glance the source looks good. I wouldn't revert the sourced addition. Artem.G (talk) 14:48, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Artem.G, I agree with your reversion here, and not pleased that the editor immediately moved to yet another title. Not very happy with the editor's other changes either, really. For instance he's also moved Template:Middle-earth films. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:40, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Agree, though I don't know enough policies that can prevent such renames. It's especially strange when the people moving pages made no other contributions to moved articles. Artem.G (talk) 16:36, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, the article and template are about moving pictures only, not games, figurines, books, theatre plays, music, or anything else, so the current titles are wrong - we already have material on other adaptations so now there is overlap and confusion. How does a new user do it? Easily, and the sanctions are hard to apply for content-based disruption: if they edit-war it's easier. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:29, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the key contributions of two Australian scientists in World War II Review essay: Nick-D reports on his recent visits to British military sites

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Saung-Gauk.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 16:46, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Artem, can you check the following link, all the websites in Chinese say the scene is from mountain Lu and Poyang Lake. Thank you! https://zjnews.zjol.com.cn/zjnews/zjxw/201802/t20180202_6508393.shtml Gweilo60 (talk) 09:01, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gweilo60 The source is fine, though next time please add your sources directly into article to avoid reverts. Thanks! Artem.G (talk) 18:00, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Cybernetics. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in red at the top of the page. Thanks! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:53, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there! It seems you forgot notifications for your latest GAR noms. Are you aware of User:SD0001/GAR-helper? It notifies the nominator, reviewer and (optionally) creator automatically and generates the syntax for nominating the major contributors manually. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 18:18, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yeah, I forgot about it. Now several wikiprojects are notified, though I think they're dead. And thanks for the script, wasn't aware about it! Artem.G (talk) 18:23, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on translation and Eisenhower's armies Review essay: Catlemur on military museums in Athens

Hi Artem.G,

This is to let you know that File:EHT Saggitarius A black hole.tif, a featured picture you uploaded, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for May 12, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-05-12. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:05, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sagittarius A* is the supermassive black hole at the Galactic Center of the Milky Way. It is located near the border of the constellations Sagittarius and Scorpius, about 5.6 degrees south of the ecliptic, visually close to the Butterfly Cluster and Lambda Scorpii. On May 12, 2022, astronomers released this first image of the accretion disk around the event horizon of Sagittarius A*, produced in April 2017 by the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT), a worldwide network of radio observatories, confirming the object to be a black hole. This was the second confirmed image of a black hole, after EHT's image of M87* released in 2019. Image credit: EHT Collaboration Recently featured: Pinnularia Palácio Rio Negro La Fuensanta Archive More featured pictures

• view
• talk
• edit
• history
• watch
• file page

Re article ChatGPT, not only is the article currently semi-protected, but its Talk page is also semi-protected (unregistered users not only can't make improvements to the page, but also can't even suggest them.) This strikes me as a pretty un-Wikipedian way of doing things.

As a workaround, perhaps you could make this change:

Article currently says

To prevent offensive outputs from being presented to and produced from ChatGPT, queries are filtered through OpenAI's company-wide moderation API, and potentially racist or sexist prompts are dismissed.

I don't understand the implications of this statement, and I'm sure that there must be many other users who also don't.

At a minimum, could we at least make API a link here, so that users could easily read our article about API?

Thanks - 189.122.243.241 (talk) 19:12, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Link added! Page is protected because it attracts too many vandals. Once the hype will end, the protection will probably be removed. Artem.G (talk) 10:39, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hog Farm on the Trans-Mississippi Theater of the American Civil War

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gerrit Verschuur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Bang Theory.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Artem.G, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I deleted FAST J0139+4328, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow and specific, and the process is more effective if the correct criterion is used. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 20:36, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent uploads, such as the file you uploaded at Eiichiro Oda, did not appear to be constructive and has been or soon will be deleted. Please read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Rejoy²⁰⁰³(talk) 13:43, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I didn't upload that file, just found it on commons. Artem.G (talk) 14:09, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See [3], even though you may have not "uploaded on commons" it is still not appropriate to upload images in the Infoboxes of articles which are copyrighted. Next time just make sure to have a proper scrutiny done. Rejoy²⁰⁰³(talk) 14:19, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Core Contest—Wikipedia's most exciting contest—will take place this year from April 15 to May 31. The goal: to improve vital or other core articles, with a focus on those in the worst state of disrepair. Editing can be done individually, but in the past groups have also successfully competed. There is £300 of prize money divided among editors who provide the "best additive encyclopedic value". Signups are open now. Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24.

If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.

On 17 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Queenie Pie, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that jazz composer Duke Ellington worked on his only opera, Queenie Pie, from the 1930s until his death in 1974 without finishing it? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Queenie Pie. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Queenie Pie), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 12:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial and the South China Sea raid, Hawkeye7 on the 1999 East Timor intervention

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sergei Korolev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ukrainian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For your amazing and valuable article contributions on a range of topics. I'm fascinated to read any of your work that I come across. Thank you! Eddie891 Talk Work 18:27, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

thanks, nice to hear that :) Artem.G (talk) 19:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for reviewing my article. Can you elaborate why my source is not important, considering he is a creditable scholar and archeologist? Hellokitty6688 (talk) 16:23, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

hey, this is the section: Archaeologist and scholar A.L. Frothingham traces these influences in an article titled "Notes on Byzantine Art and Culture in Italy and Especially in Rome," published in The American Journal of Archaeology in 1895.<ref ((Cite journal |last=Frothingham |first=A. L. |date=1895 |title=Notes on Byzantine Art and Culture in Italy and Especially in Rome |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/496574 |journal=The American Journal of Archaeology and of the History of the Fine Arts |volume=10 |issue=2 |pages=152–208 |doi=10.2307/496574 |issn=1540-5079)) /ref> The article explores the influence of Byzantine art and culture in Italy, particularly in Rome. Frothingham examines the development of Byzantine art in Italy from the early Christian period to the late Middle Ages, discussing the various influences and styles that emerged during this time. He also considers the role of Byzantine art in the cultural and intellectual life of Italy, and how it influenced the development of Italian art and the Renaissance.

I see several issues here - first, it's sourced only by a primary source, so it's not clear why is this publication important, and who consider it to be important. Surely there are many papers that "traces these influences", do we want to mention them all? And second, the description is very obscure - "Frothingham examines the development" ... "discussing " ... "He also considers the role". The article was published 120+ years ago, surely there should be better sources that say how exactly Byzantine art impacted "the cultural and intellectual life of Italy".

It's better to have this conversation on the article's talk page, but I think that inclusion of vague description of 120+ old article is undue and doesn't bring anything to the subject, except the information that some archaeologist examined it a long time ago. Artem.G (talk) 07:59, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's also unusual to write about the publication on the subject - it can be used as a source or maybe listed in Further reading, but why should this single publication be mentioned in the text? Artem.G (talk) 08:14, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you, your explanation is very clear and helpful. Hellokitty6688 (talk) 17:04, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page ChatGPT, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)&section=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:39, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Western Allied invasion of Germany Op-ed: Hawkeye7's tips for writing articles on military logistics

Thanks for copyediting the planets' articles after I've rewritten the lead. I really do appreciate your work and I do mean it :) CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 16:48, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Western Allied invasion of Germany Op-ed: Hawkeye7's tips for writing articles on military logistics

On 18 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Last Supper (photograph), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a photograph inspired by one of Leonardo da Vinci's paintings shows 14 Israeli soldiers and was described as a "homoerotic challenge to Israeli machismo"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Last Supper (photo). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Last Supper (photograph)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 24,152 views (1,006.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of May 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Asteroid impact avoidance, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:55, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Theodore von Kármán, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:15, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D review three recent works

First of all, thank you for merely reverting my edit and for your deference in not slapping a whopping great big vandalism warning on my talk page. Seems to be one of the few perks us/we old timers have here at Wikipedia. Come to think of it, a "good faith" whatchamacallit in the Revision history might have been nicer.

You kindly invite/request me to bring up any issues I may have regarding the article on the corresponding talk page (see comment below). However, I decline to do so. Basically because I can't be bothered. Why is that? Because I arrived at that article by chance, saw that it had a coupla wonky bits, fixed 'em, noticed in passing that the vast majority of the current 186 references did not conform to what I have always been led to be believe is the standard format (while I am aware of certain slight differences among them, basically, and I'm sure you'll be more than happy to correct me if I'm wrong, most major referencing styles including, as far as I'm aware, Wikipedia templates, put the author's surname (or, if you prefer, last name) followed by her/his initial(s) or first name, and then had the gall to slap a "large" copyedit tag (actually just the standard Twinkle tag) and went on my merry way to carry on patrolling, revert a couple of vandal edits and then to enjoy my well-earned dinner.

However, ignoring both the spirit and the letter of the 3rd circumstance by which, according to WP:WTRMT (admittedly a mere "how-to guide", not one of yer high-falutin' Wikipedia policies or guidelines), a maintenance template may be removed (cited below for your convenience):

3. If it reasonably appears that the template did not belong when placed or was added in error. Consider first discussing the matter with the original placer of the template (unless this user is no longer active on Wikipedia). In any case, if the issue appears contentious, seek consensus on the talk page... (my bold)

you took it upon yourself to revert my "large" copyedit tag without "first discussing..." or, if you considered the issue to be "contentious", seeking "consensus"...

BTW, reading between the lines here, it seems that you are especially upset because I had the gall to slap a "large" copyedit tag on a GA, a GA from ten years ago, which has since been reviewed and... Are you seriously suggesting that after ten years of exposure to the singular conditions of an "encyclopedia that anyone can edit" a GA article may not be in the need of a thorough revision? That's obviously a rhetorical question since, as you may already have gathered from the tone of this reply to your reversion of my good faith edit, yours truly is not in the slightest bit interested in your reply. As in, save yourself the effort and sieze the opportunity use the time I'm so kindly saving you in reviewing the GA under discussion. Happy editing! --Technopat (talk) 21:25, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Artem.G, I noticed your interest in articles relating to AI and thought you might be willing to review my suggested edits at Talk:Mustafa Suleyman. Thanks for your time, MforSuleyman (talk) 11:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

concept the map indicates graphical representation of knowledge i) How this model is important to teach secondary level science ? develop the lesson plan to teach atomic structure at secondary level students by using concept map 103.94.255.91 (talk) 08:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The winners of the 2023 The Core Contest are announced 🎉. We had an amazing set of improvements this year, and the judges (Femke, Aza24 and Casliber) would like to thank everybody who joined and congratulate the winners.

• First place goes to Buidhe for improving The Holocaust; very core, highly relevant; their work on bringing geographical balance to the article puts the topic in a whole different light. We also commend improvements to sourcing and prose
• A close second place goes to Phlsph7 for improving Education from an unstructured jumble into a well-sourced piece of instruction
• Third prize goes to Johnbod for improving Donatello, a near five-fold expansion with great sourcing and fantastic imagery
• A tie for fourth place goes to Thebiguglyalien for improving Crime, for a strong improvement in sourcing
• A tie for fifth place goes to Sammielh for International law, improved by converting contextless listicles into a proper sourced prose

If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 20:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I didn't find an article include collapse, there are many sources about this subject we can't add it as predict for dollar? I added another paragraph in talk page and there is so... cordialment DRIS92 (talk) 16:12, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Such predictions about collapse of the dollar are made almost every year since prehistoric times, and if we don't want to play with a crystal ball we shouldn't include such bold statements into any encyclopedic article. Artem.G (talk) 18:22, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Theodore von Kármán 230419-F-F3405-0001 (restored).jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 18:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I saw you deleted my description of a paper. I meant to expand it but got interrupted. In the meantime, do you think would be ok to add the citation to this sentence: "In the field of health care, possible uses and concerns are under scrutiny by professional associations and practitioners." An Interview with ChatGPT About Health Care | NEJM Catalyst

I found the paper informative, Thanks TMorata (talk) 20:49, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sure, the paper can be informative, I just though that its description was too vague. Feel free to use it as a ref, or add few points you think worth mentioning; it can be also be added to Further reading section. Artem.G (talk) 20:54, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks! TMorata (talk) 21:25, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Qian Xuesen, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: