The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:17, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Charity watchdog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dictionary article Rathfelder (talk) 14:47, 2 March 2016 (UTC) ((move to wiktionary))[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 16:52, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Encyclopedia article. Andrew D. (talk) 17:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and improve if needed. SwisterTwister talk 07:43, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - This is the sort of article we could accept at WP:TAFI, It's certainly a notable subject and could easily be expanded to include most if not all of the world, Fails DICEDEF (IE doesn't meet it) and Meets GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 11:57, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.