The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural close. No actual rationale provided beyond "this article is outdated", which is not valid and this nomination is disruptive. (non-admin closure)‎ λ NegativeMP1 18:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog)[edit]

Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Welp,looks this this article is outdated. Veyleagggjj (talk) 17:44, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 April 3. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Video games. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:30, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - WP:OUTDATED is not a valid reason to delete an entire article. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:32, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment (edit conflict) - being "outdated" isn't a valid deletion rationale. Unless you've got a different, valid reason, this will just end up closed without action. Sergecross73 msg me 18:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Procedural close. No trace of a valid deletion reason, and the nomination was Veyleagggjj's second edit ever. Geschichte (talk) 18:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Their first ever edit, by the way, was to start a GA Review. That attempt should be stopped in its tracks. Furthermore, it highlights the fact that this nomination was ill-conceived - though I see several merge opinions from the past. Geschichte (talk) 18:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.