The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 12:28, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chantilly (fragrance) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability. Both sources are merely directory entries. TheLongTone (talk) 14:30, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:33, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Another unbelievably short stub about a topic that doesn't meet WP:GNG. Along with that, both it's "sources" are just links to online fragrance stores.Grapefruit17 (talk) 15:09, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I am unable to find any reliable secondary sources, so the subject fails WP:GNG. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:12, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.