The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 15:37, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chandler Dash

[edit]

Asserts notability by association, but has only one source which is bloggish and in any case does not mention the subject. 38 unique Google hits do not include any significant coverage in reliable independent sources, and all substantive edits are by a WP:SPA. Looks like self-promotion to me. Guy (Help!) 13:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no coverage by independent reliable sources. GoogleNews has 11 hits[1] but all are false positives. Fails WP:BIO. Nsk92 (talk) 15:34, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 13:48, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article was previously speedily deleted, and its subject is still just as non-notable. Doing a quoted Google search for "Chandler Dash" brings up 0 non-Wikipedia hits that reference this person, which is pretty much a guarantee of non-notability for a pop-culture subject. Sashaman (talk) 04:56, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it seems to me if the article were true there should be plenty of reliable sources, and there aren't. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:47, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.