The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --JForget 23:37, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Castilian American (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

There is nothing written in this article. Also, Castilians are the Majority in Spain, and the word Spanish and Castilian are interchangeable. I don't know why there is a separate article. There is already Spanish American. Lehoiberri (talk) 22:54, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Oh no, not this junk again!! The horror!! The horror!! Delete this as being a content-free article based on an arbitrary combination of countries. Get rid of the Andalusian one below, as well. Reyk _YO! 00:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for being arbitrary. Why no Flemish-Americans or Alsatian-Americans or Bavarian-Americans? This is also borderline WP:Complete Bollocks. Eddie.willers (talk) 01:22, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete can we just block John Paraskeva Rushton (talk · contribs) already? I think he's worn out his welcome. JuJube (talk) 01:27, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment- that would be overkill, and unfair. As annoying as they are, these articles are probably well-intentioned. Reyk _YO! 01:35, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I already warned John Paraskeva Rushton (talk · contribs) to work on his basically blanked articles on July 8 (See here [1]), or I will send them to WP:AFD. This user hasn't respond to me, nor he worked on his articles, they are still nothing but almost blank pages. Not only that, this user is creating even more of these articles, like this Castilian American. Lehoiberri (talk) 02:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Another non-notable article. Artene50 (talk) 09:20, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete followed by cease and desist and block user--this has been quite the annoyance and is disruptive to Wikipedia. The user knows that these types of articles are deleted (ten or so? how many? can we get a count?) and continues to do so.--Paul McDonald (talk) 11:16, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.