The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 00:33, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Casio PV-100

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Information already exists in Pocket Viewer, why is this one special? The article contains only specifications and the only source is the manual. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 22:42, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nevermind the fact that this is not a place for the collection of speccs and point by point features WP:INDISCRIMINATE this article has little to no Notability WP:GNG. Andrdema (talk) 06:57, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:41, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unlikely a better solid separate article. SwisterTwister talk 00:23, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.