The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. (ESkog)^(Talk) 07:03, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to go through hotel pages to remove spam and un-notable entries. This luxury hotel in New York is relatively new and has no apparent history. The article was created by an anonymous user who has a total of 3 edits, all pimping HKHotels, which I am also nominating. The Library Hotel (page started by the same user) at least has a bit of interest, the two I'm nominating are essentially spam and have not been edited since their creation apart from cosmetic edits. Pascal.Tesson 02:59, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete. I agree with your points but say weak here because if some editors add more info to this on the history of the buidling or the significance of the architecture, I'd change and urge a keep. Perhaps the AfD tag will push the creator to do something with this. Interlingua ^talk 04:17, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete, though the hotel is a five star hotel and though it does have a large amount of Google results [1], I can't find any other evidence of notability--TBCTaLk?!? 08:13, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete per above. --Coredesat 08:56, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete. The google search is a bit misleading as it includes other hotels with the same name, and hotels in Casablanca. Stu ^{’Bout ye!} 11:09, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - In general, hotels are not inherently notable. No objection to recreating this if it is found to be otherwise noteworthy. Wickethewok 17:14, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Delete per Interlingua. ---Charles 19:33, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Both per Wickethewok. --DaveG12345 21:04, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete per above comments. —Xyrael 21:21, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: no claim to notability. Fram 12:57, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. If HKHotels don't care...--Richhoncho 21:18, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.