The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 21:31, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cartoon Network Block Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unreferenced, this article has no sources. JJ98 (Talk) 23:38, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

This was good article and now I find out it has been deleted because two people kind of thought maybe it should have been. Here's an idea: if you didn't like the article don't look at it. People had obviously worked hard on this and it was actually useful unlike 99% of the articles on this site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.89.143.160 (talk) 15:17, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]