The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted. I used G2, on the AGF position that the editor copied one article for the format of this one. G3 may also apply, though, per this edit. If this is indeed a plausible search term for Black Nazarene, on which I have no opinion, then a redirect would be preferred. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 14:40, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Carlo Doctura (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is a copy of the article Black Nazarene entitled under some unknown person's name. It should not be redirected; it should be deleted. — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• ^Speak! 06:16, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Nobody named "Carlo Doctura" is mentioned in the text of the article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:07, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.