The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Canoe. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:12, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian canoe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced WP:DICDEF, flagged for both neutrality and sourcing issues since 2013 without any actual improvement since, of a variant term for the exact same thing we're already covering in much more depth in canoe. It's true that there are some dialects of English in which "canoe" is used to mean "kayak", so the term "Canadian canoe" is used to distinguish this form of canoe from the other usage, but that's not the way we're using "canoe" as a page title here: we're not using it as a disambiguation page to differentiate "Canadian canoes" from kayaks, but as the main article about "Canadian canoes" — so under those circumstances, the "Canadian canoe" title doesn't actually need its own standalone article as a separate concept from itself. Just to be clear, I fully support the recreation of a redirect from this title back to canoe afterward — but this, as written, should still be deleted first to minimize the possibility of future edit-warring over the "redirect vs. standalone article" issue. Bearcat (talk) 07:51, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 08:30, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• My findings concur with nom. A lack lf notability is also a problem. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:04, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:40, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support or at any rate I don't oppose the deletion - as long as, as mentioned above, those readers looking for "Canadian canoe" quickly find themselves at Canoe. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 22:51, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and Redirect per nom - this is a disambiguation page that has had a makeover and gone to the ball. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:53, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete/redirect per nom. Szzuk (talk) 15:15, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.