The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:29, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Camp Dora Golding (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Article has essentially no content. No claim of notability and Google comes up with nothing remotely close to significant third-party coverage. Pascal.Tesson 21:43, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete NN and virtually no content. ILovePlankton^(L—n) 21:50, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, just a listing of non-notable people working for a non-notable camp, no indication if the information is even current (as it's an industry with a high rate of turnover). --Dhartung | Talk 02:07, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no assertion of importance, just a list of staff. No reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq 16:37, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Bearian 21:48, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.