The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 21:15, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Callision[edit]

Callision (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the notability guideline for companies. The article does cite one potentially usable review, which seems to be a decent independent source; however, it is quite brief, and the multiple high-quality sources required to satisfy NCORP do not appear to exist. – Teratix ₵ 06:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 06:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 06:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 06:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non notable company with no supporting valid sources. Some are PR. Google news did not bring up anything good. Expertwikiguy (talk) 10:17, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Concur with Expertwikiguy, not finding anything notable on google news, No obvious meeting of WP:N Jeepday (talk) 15:12, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.