The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 08:19, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Advanced search for:  "calendar of saints Melanesia"
In books/documents  Google Books Internet Archive  · WorldCat
In the news  Google News: recent  · archives Free English newspaper archives
In academic/legal journals  and reference works  Google Scholar: academic  · legal The Wikipedia Library Oxford Reference  · JSTOR PUBMED Central Internet Archive
World Wide Web pages  Google Web Search  · Advanced Search Searx 1  · 2  · 3  · 4 Bing  · DuckDuckGo  · Startpage Yahoo
Images (free)  Google  · Flickr

Calendar of saints (Church of the Province of Melanesia) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is some type of localized version of the Calendar of saints. I cannot verify its existence. There's a good chance it probably does exist, but regardless it clearly does not pass WP:GNG Rusf10 (talk) 02:30, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 02:30, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 02:30, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 02:30, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 02:30, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge some of it into Anglican Church of Melanesia. Probably not the full list, but perhaps a few representative examples. —Sean Whitton / 02:36, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Can't find any reliable source for it. I don't think it will pass the notability guideline by any chance. Mommmyy (talk) 03:12, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete There don't seem to be reliable sources online to verify the claims in the article. Sources might exist, but the lack of significant coverage means the article fails GNG. A merge isn't appropriate since none of the claims can be verified at this time. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:03, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom no reliable sources availble to pass GNG. JaredDaEconomist (talk) 05:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: coverage is weak and reliable sources not found. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 04:55, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.