The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:23, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CW Real Estate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Flowery text used, winner of a non-notable award. Largely appears promo. Many of the sources used read as PR pieces. Not meeting notability requirements. Oaktree b (talk) 22:39, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Nigeria. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:54, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as quite obviously promo and (less obviously, but I googled a bit) non-notable. Deckkohl (talk) 18:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:NORG, which must have significant, in depth, independent coverage on the subject. There must be absolute minimum of two such sources and one of them has to be broad audience such as national or international. Needless to say, they all need to be reliable source. Graywalls (talk) 23:28, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep i understand that it is a company which is likely trying to appear on wikipedia. Since there are other companies alike on wikipedia, I think it should be kept for further review by other editors who are likely to come across it.Engrdrizzy (talk) 09:43, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Evidently promotional sources - the newspaper articles look as though they've been written from a narrative put out by the company. Major doubt over the independence of the content WP:ORGIND. Sources in the article don't satisfy the indepth coverage required by WP:CORPDEPTH. Found nothing from searching that does either. Rupples (talk) 23:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.