The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:12, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CSRWire Canada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obvious WP:CORPSPAM. As written, fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Nevertheless, per my obligatory procedures, press coverage, to the extent that there even was any, is all trivial and trite coverage—mostly passing mentions, directory listings, and the like for this small, non-notable and dime-a-dozen press release distribution service. Doug Mehus (talk) 00:08, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Doug Mehus (talk) 00:08, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Added Comment from AfD Nominator: CSRWire USA was previously deleted by PROD in January 2019 for the same concerns.--Doug Mehus (talk) 00:10, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Could not find any sources that were actually reliable. From AnUnnamedUser ^{(open talk page)} 00:19, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - It's possibly worth considering a CSRWire article (if I understand the relationship correctly), but absent that, there's no clear redirect target and there's nothing here to retain other than a yellow pages listing. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:55, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No source to established the notability. --Streetdeck (talk) 03:45, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:05, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:05, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:05, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:06, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:06, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, fails GNG. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:24, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.