The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:42, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CEL-SCI Corporation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Version at time of AfD Nomination—Diff vs. current version)

Doesn't seem to meet WP:ORGCRITE: provided sources are either primary (2, 3, 5, 6), trivial/routine (1, 7, 8, 11), or published in business publications of dubious reliability and independence (4, 9, 10, n.b. that 9 explicitly discloses that they were solicited by the subject to write the report, and thus decreases my willingness to give the benefit of the doubt to other borderline sources). Searching online turned up more of the same _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:06, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:06, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:06, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not notable under the GNG considering the quality of sourcing. Also, it was created and mainly edited by a user who might have a connection to the subject and created couple of other closely related articles of questionable notability. So, taken as whole I think it should be deleted. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:04, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• I also included a source and I think it is far more better then the original state. Also, I read general guidelines mentioned above and it seems meeting the general criteria. I am no expert was just searching about Multikine and landed here and it is interesting. I'll do some more research and add. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.8.111.218 (talk) 19:26, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.