The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn procedurally pending the outcome of the active AFD - this may or may not be revisited following its closure. --Core desat 00:38, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Buffyverse chronology (canon only)

[edit]

Nominating this for pretty much the same reasons as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buffyverse chronology. It appears to be original research and fansite material ("this list is one interpretation...certain productions have not been accepted or rejected among fans"), and is completely unsourced. Most of articles it links are also unsourced and possibly also original research, as the only sources most of them use are IMDB pages or reviews that do not contain any of the information on them. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, nor is it a publisher of original thought. As before, a transwiki to a Buffy fan wiki (perhaps on Wikia?) might be a good idea. Core desat 14:44, 1 March 2007 (UTC) Nomination procedurally withdrawn, see below. --Core desat 23:23, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I voted in favor of keeping the other chronology articles, but this one is too much a case of duplication and POV judgement calls 23skidoo 16:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC) Withdrawn per request by Coredesat. 23skidoo 00:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sourced to the TV episodes and othre "canon". Edison 16:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Should this nomination be combined with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buffyverse chronology, since this article is a sub-page of the 'Buffyverse chronology' article? -- Paxomen 17:38, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Agree with Paxomen. This discussion should be merged. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hobit (talk • contribs) 18:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Comment I didn't combine these articles into a single AFD because I did not catch Buffyverse chronology (canon only) until the original AFD had been well underway. Since it had been about 10 hours since the original AFD nomination, I felt starting a new discussion was warranted. I will ask another admin to merge the discussions. --Core desat 19:18, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Feeling at WP:ANI was that the two threads should not be combined. Also, there seems to be a distinction: there's a better case for deletion here as OR, since "canon issues" are involved, which makes it even more subjective and in need of sources. Mango juice^talk 21:31, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Assuming the other article isn't deleted (which appeared likely) I'm not as sure about this article. There might be some POV or OR issues with what is or isn't "cannon", and it sounds like this index and the other index have significant overlap. So I'd probably support merging this one into the larger one. Dugwiki 22:14, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am procedurally withdrawing the nomination to wait for the other AFD to finish. Since there is a delete argument at this time, I cannot speedily close the AFD until the delete argument is withdrawn. I will revisit this after the other AFD concludes. --Core desat 23:23, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.