The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete all. Mindmatrix 15:36, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable band, their own website indicates most albums only had 1000 copies made (though one album allegedly had 5000 cassettes created). Google doesn't turn up a whole lot either (at least in my limited research). I've included the two articles about their CDs in this AfD as well (if the band isn't notable, the albums definitely aren't). Thoughts? Locke Cole 03:35, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete. Non-notable bands can now be speedy deleted with ((db-band)). I have added that tag to the page. Ifnord 19:00, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • True, but then you can't use ((db-repost)) if the article comes back. I notice it's been nuked, but hopefully people will still participate for the two album articles also up for deletion here. —Locke Cole 07:38, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • Sure you can. Db-repost says that it applies to anything recreated which was "removed in accordance with the deletion policy." WP:CSD is part of our deletion policy, as I understand it. (ESkog)^(Talk) 09:52, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
      • Weird, I could have swore I'd had a ((db-repost)) delete request denied because the article had only ever been deleted before via CSD (non-notable, as I recall, except with an individual not a band). Okay, will try that next time, good to know. =) —Locke Cole 09:55, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete --NaconKantari 19:00, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Ridiculous to have albums by bands speedied as non-notable. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 07:35, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete At Any Speed We'll get there eventually from non-notability, one way or another. The real debate now seems to be when rather than if. karmafist 00:21, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.