The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. Non-admin closure RoninBK _{T C} 18:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Broumov Airport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

The article is copied from webpage http://www.airbroumov.eu/index.php?pageurl=airport. It is written like an advertisement and it is written in Czech. Kubek15 - Talk, Userboxes, Contributions 09:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Appears to have been rewritten now. J Milburn (talk) 11:26, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep As the original reasons for deletion have been fixed [1]. Perfectly acceptable stub. Pedro :  Chat  11:32, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No claims of notability (I know that's not what the nominator picked, but it still applies), no third party sources either. TJ Spyke 11:57, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - now that it has been translated into English. There are thousands (hundreds of thousands?) of similar stubs for airports, towns, rivers, etc. Personally, I would get rid of all of them on notability grounds but there is a long consensus that such stubs be kept. They are verifiable and Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia. Sbowers3 (talk) 13:23, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• OK, I close this AfD. The result is keep. Thanks for voting. Kubek15 - Talk, Userboxes, Contributions 17:08, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.