The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) v/r - TP 12:12, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brother Reade (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possible non-notable musicians only sourced to AllMusic. They do not seem to pass WP:MUSICIAN. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:53, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Additional sources - [1][2][3][4] - added to the article. There appears to be enough significant coverage out there for the subject to meet WP:MUSICBIO.  Gongshow ^Talk 00:41, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Author Keep Gongshow picked up the ball on this one...yeah, they meet WP:MUSIC. Chubbles (talk) 16:37, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Per GNG, per sources that are now in the article. Thanks to Gongshow.--Epeefleche (talk) 00:51, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Question. Are CD reviews enough? Both SPIN write-ups are seem to be CD reviews, and the Stylus article seems to be focused on the CD as well. Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:10, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, CD reviews are fine. Keep. Bearian (talk) 18:53, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.