The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:47, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brossard-Chevrier Park and Ride

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

a bus terminal. fails general notability guideline, article cited to primary sources. ltb d l (talk) 07:59, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Canada. ltb d l (talk) 07:59, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG. Insignificant transport station with very little coverage. Ajf773 (talk) 09:16, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It has some coverage. The problem is that the article appears to be in large part untrue.
- Dostie, Ali (2023-02-14). "Brossard demande le maintien du stationnement Chevrier". Lo Courrier du Sud (in French).
- Hersir, Michel (2023-07-27). "435 places seront maintenues au stationnement Chevrier… pour l'instant". Lo Courrier du Sud (in French).
Uncle G (talk) 15:34, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, or maybe redirect to Brossard station. Good catch by Uncle G; it appears the facility has been superseded (or soon will be) by the new REM station. I've added a mention there. Mackensen (talk) 00:36, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.