The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete All the indications are that this is a hoax. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:06, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BrightSide Adult Entertainment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a hoax; I can't find any evidence of "BrightSide Adult Entertainment" online, and the article seems to be lightly rewritten from the Elegant Angel article. Trivialist (talk) 20:47, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Elegant Angel. I seem to have found evidence online, although certainly not from reliable sources. Not enough unique information to merge. 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 21:02, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If the sources are not reliable, then they are irrelevant. Anyone can create unreliable sources making any false claims they like, and it is by no means unknown for authors of hoax articles to do just that. What is more, you haven't even told us what the unreliable sources are. We can't attach any weight at all to someone claiming to have unreliable sources that we can't even see for ourselves. See WP:RS and WP:V. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:01, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete as a more than probable hoax, fails verifiability. Zero GNews hits, zero GBooks hits, some Google hits that are all mirrors/derived from Wikipedia. I could have missed something, but none of the sources of the article appears to mention "BrightSide Adult Entertainment" or something similar. The same article mentions BrightSide just three times (in the infobox, in the lead and in the first sentence of History section), and for the rest it is a "copy and paste" of the Elegant Angel article. If someone has found some evidences about the contrary is welcome, but he should provide his evidences here. Cavarrone (talk) 07:49, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete as hoax. All sourcing appears phony or irrelevant. Article "creator" has no other edits. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 12:02, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a hoax. The article is a copy of Elegant Angel with only the lead paragraph changed. Searches for Brightside Adult Entertainment get Wikipedia mirrors. • Gene93k (talk) 12:48, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.