The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 is almost Singularity 00:59, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bridges Community Academy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

expired uncontested prod (notability), but it's been around over a year and is school related so may be controversial, so taken to afd. I agree with the prod-er that it fails WP:N, and if this is the state it's in 20 months on, is it going to get any better? Carlossuarez46 23:46, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep What is supposed to be the problem? It's notable of course. LukeHoC 02:11, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete small school with no "significant coverage" from independent sources. I cant pull up the first link as the site is down, but even then it require more sources to establish notability Corpx 05:19, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Been here long ebough to expand but really hasn't been with all those edits. It comes across like an ad to me.--Amadscientist 04:55, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Notability requires that "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" - at this point it doesn't look like this article meets that standard. -- MarcoTolo 03:54, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.