The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 05:45, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Breather supersolid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

I doubt Breather supersolid means anything - no references, sounds dubious, and search engines have nothing to back it up. Been here since May 2006 Moglex 00:37, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 10:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Pseudoscience, at best. Argyriou (talk) 16:32, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unreferenced and not yet notable. It appears to be a real concept in physics - Breathers are, in this context, and this page here mentions a talk at the Max Planck Institute Dresden on Breather Supersolids by one Stan Kladko. But it looks so cutting-edge that this the only reference, so no go. Plus the poster is Kladko1` (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Gordonofcartoon 00:36, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.