The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-04-28 07:21Z

Bra day (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

File:BraDaytrad1.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (added by closing admin)

File:Bradayyoung.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (added by closing admin)

File:Bracake.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (added by closing admin)

Smells fake. 0 Ghits for "yay-D-bra". Prod removed by author. JuJube 00:39, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• What the heck is this... Lets delete until there are some sources. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 02:16, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - this is very amusing, but I don't see any sources which support notability here. --Haemo 03:42, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Plenty of Bra Days out there, but this one doesn't exist. Hoax. Darkspots 09:59, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete Not Notable and smells like a hoax espically without Sources. --St.daniel ^talk 12:00, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No "Swedish lingerie company" = hoax. BTLizard 12:25, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Hoax. ---Charles 16:00, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - maybe a hoax, maybe not, doesn't matter. It's just non-notable promotion. Moreschi ^Talk 17:41, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - whether or not it's a hoax is irrelevant, this is a piece of OR about an even that doesn't even happen any more and even when it happened was only "an annual event to a few of the most die-hard yay-D-bra customers". Such events do exist but I can't see why this particular one's of any note - iridescenti (talk to me!) 17:47, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No Google hits for Yay-D-Bra (except this AFD) renders this at the least non-notable original research and very possibly a hoax. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 16:39, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.