The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Flemish American Football League. Unfortunately, I can't find enough material to evidence this team's notability, but outright deletion isn't necessary when a redirect is possible. If they garner attention in the future, an independent article can be re-created. m.o.p 03:51, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bornem Titans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Fails WP:N, hasn't receieved significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. Even het Nieuwsblad, which devotes lots of attention to even minor sports in Flanders, has only mentioned the team twice in passing and never devoted significant attention to it[1]. This is an amateur team for a sport with very limited popularity in Belgium. Looking through Google[2] reveals no other good sources. Fram (talk) 12:21, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Titans are a member of the Belgium Football League, the highest level American style football league in the country. The Chicago Bandits don't get a lot of coverage, because the Chicago Bears, Chicago Bulls, and Chicago Cubs are more popular sports. This team participates at a national level, therefore they should be kept. --Tbennert (talk) 17:30, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Same argumant as Tbennert. Also, because the sport doesn't get a lot of media attention it does not have a lot of sponsors, the sport in belgian is fully based on volunteer work. So keeping a website online just for historic results is expensive. I volunteered to put al records on wikipedia with as much references to newspaper articles, etc, to make it reliable material on wikipedia. Giving the people information and knowledge through wikipedia is what wikipedia is all about, not just the popular sports but all sports. Arkangel lucifer (talk) 20:43, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not a "free web hosting server" and if this is indeed original research by policy it must be deleted.--Paul McDonald (talk) 04:59, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: the second keep opinion canvassed the first keep opinion: [3]. Fram (talk) 20:12, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.football-aktuell.de this is an independent source, German site about american football in europa, no way connected to the belgian league. also they got some media coverage: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBtuG9yIPmg Arkangel lucifer (talk) 08:53, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Also the sport is recognised by the government: http://www.topsportvlaanderen.be Arkangel lucifer (talk) 08:57, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
YouTube, I'm afraid, doesn't count as it is notoriously unreliable. The other sources are in a language that I do not comprehend, which makes it difficult for use in an English-language encyclopedia (not sure if there is a policy on this or not). However, the article could well be a candidate for one of the other language projects.--Paul McDonald (talk) 00:44, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sources may be in any language, that doesn't make any difference. But that a sport federation is recognised by the government doesn't make any of the teams more notable, and that a specialist website sometimes has attention for it doesn't help either, and I couldn't find any articles that were really about the Titans there either (a few articles mentioning them when reveiwing the competition, that seems to be it). Fram (talk) 06:58, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KrakatoaKatie 22:35, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.