The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 03:00, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bondage cuffs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be independently notable. No references demonstrate this to me. Merrill Stubing (talk) 07:33, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is a topic covered by almost every BDSM manual, of which I have just added cites to two, chosen pretty much at random. Much more citing is needed, but I believe this is sufficient to establish notability and verifiability. -- The Anome (talk) 13:37, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

keep I think if anything a merge discussion On all subsequent bondage themed articles that were nominated for deletion should have been the first step before taking this to AFD. AGF on BDSM per Anome. Ottawa4ever (talk)

• Keep per The Anome. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:03, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep -per The Anome.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:30, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.