The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete as blatant and obvious misinformation (CSD G3). – Toon^(talk) 20:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bog Marten (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Hoax; the only reference to this species comes from another wiki site (zipcodezoo); it does not appear in ITIS, Catalogue of Life, Web of Science, google scholar, or Mammals of the World. TeaDrinker (talk) 07:57, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, e.g. no mention in Google scholar. Probably not an intentional hoax, but picked up from an un-reliable source. JohnCD (talk) 09:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  15:00, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Copy of a hoax at the Marten page. No source anywhere (the zipcodezoo page is a word-for-word copy from Wikipedia) Narayanese (talk) 15:28, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment, all the text of the article was a copy-and-paste copyright violation from here, so I have deleted this text. Tim Vickers (talk) 16:08, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  The article text is from Marten. Icestorm815 • Talk 19:48, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Obvious Hoax. Icestorm815 • Talk 19:48, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Snowball delete as hoax. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 20:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.