The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close. I'm going to boldly update it via a redirect. (non-admin closure) DrStrauss talk 13:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blue waffle[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This hoax was inherently web-based but it doesn't pass WP:WEBCRIT. Its only claim to notability is that a councilwoman misused it, which fails WP:1EVENT. There's not much really that the article says about it other than that: Wikipedia is not KnowYourMeme and isn't an indiscriminate collection of internet crazes. If one compares it with other hoaxes such as dihydrogen monoxide, one can see that the latter does meet the criteria for inclusion because it has received sustained coverage and had a wide-ranging impact, whereas the first was merely a prank which a councilwoman fell for. DrStrauss talk 13:26, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.