The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 00:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Black River Beach Neighborhood Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Other than the expected local coverage, and even that is very sparse, and consists mostly of trivial mentions, nothing on the search engines shows this passes WP:GNG. Was deprodded without rationale by the article's creator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:04, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete this place it will be very important. --Wikideas1 (talk) 22:57, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Just a local facility, fails WP:GNG. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:46, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above, not notable. MB 01:49, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Per nom. Cannot find reliable sourcing to satisfy WP:GNG. GauchoDude (talk) 13:22, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.