The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 23:13, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BharatPe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In its current form, this entity's article fails WP:NCORP, WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. In the past, the page has been declined at AfC level ... thrice. And, on the fourth time... it was passed without making any substantial edits and the reviewer paid no attention to the comments of the immediate past reviewer. Also, possible WP:COI at creator 's end. Before this nomination, a detailed discussion has taken place at Talk:BharatPe - please do refer to it. - Hatchens (talk) 03:04, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 03:04, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 03:04, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I've managed to locate some research reports from analyst firms which appear to profile the topic company. There is one from Juniper Research and because the domain openpr.com is blacklisted, if you search for the term ""QR Code Payments Market Trends, Research" in your favorite search engine you should find research from A2Z Market Research. Finally, there is also this JM Financial report which features a profile of the company on page 42. Topic company passes WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 21:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per HighKing's observation. I had accepted it because I felt the Economic times article related to the controversy and PMC Bank merger coverage along with Business India article seemed to be enough for WP:THREE. But I see why you wouldn't want to count them for WP:CORPDEPTH. As I have said before, it's a difficult criteria to discuss and different editors can feel differently about it (reason to accept after others rejected). Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 23:29, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.