The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:53, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bhagavatha Dharmam

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable journal Tentinator 09:37, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article is short and has NO sources to prove notability.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 13:16, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 20:14, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless sources are provided. ~~Honestly WP:BLPPROD would have been a better way to handle this.~~ TonyBallioni (talk) 21:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete BLPPROD is only applicable to BLPs... Anyway. I get several hits in Google most of them to a book of the same title. The magazine exists, I found some blog posts and such, but nothing substantial and it doesn't even seem to have a website. --Randykitty (talk) 22:09, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that out. I did a quick read of the article and thought it said "newsman" for some reason. My mistake! TonyBallioni (talk) 22:16, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.