The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (NPASR) (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (spout) @ 21:34, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bernardo Neumann

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable. There's a lack of coverage about him in independent reliable sources. Of the purely local sourcing found in the article, none that can be reached have any depth of coverage about him. A look at sourcing at time of nomination:

1 dead link

2 dead link

3 not an independent reliable source

4 appears to be by him

5 short listing of a university exhibition on a blog.

Not good enough. A search found nothing better. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:30, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:57, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:57, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:58, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:52, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deadbeef 00:08, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The references flagged as dead links are nonetheless references in reliable sources. References do not need to be online to be valid. This is an artist who has had solo exhibitions in several different countries. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:31, 14 December 2014 (. UTC)

And which part of any of that make him notable? The dead links are local coverage that may or may not exist. The creator of this page, in this case using his Misty2011 account, has a history of faking verification, faking article titles, faking his identity, just straight out faking. A little bit of maybe local interest coverage does not make him notable. Solo exhibitions by themselves do not make him notable. Where were they, small towns, small places, Hochschuhl Christian community? Galeria Ikkon? None major exhibitions. None verified. None with any coverage. Yes he's been abroad and done show and done talks. But where? Here? "Capacity: 30 persons". Not the stuff of notability. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:03, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The references confirm the subject to be a working artist but do not indicate that he meets the WP:ARTIST criteria, nor are multiple searches finding anything better. AllyD (talk) 14:50, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, Ref. 4 is the only non-local one, but this is a national newspaper, and I do not see any evidence that it is a blog section or smth. If they have chosen to publish a page about him (even if written by him), this suggests some notability. More sources could be good to have of course.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.