The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 14:50, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Berghoffveien 48 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prodded with the reason "Not notable. Doesn't meet WP:GNG" and prod-2'ed with the reason "Textbook WP:MILL. I don't see how this house rises above all other houses being repaired/moved in the world." I agree with both. Geschichte (talk) 14:53, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, although I think the reasons are stronger than those given in the PROD nominations. The content of the article appears to be all wrong; according to the link given, this is not a house being moved, but a series of duplex houses that are under construction; common fare with no encyclopedic notability. The only relevant websites I have found are adverts for the project. Sjakkalle (Check!) 17:25, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I find no basis for notability here. --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:33, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Unable to find any valid references and per Sjakkalle. The link in the article does make me want to buy, but at around one million dollars, I'll pass. Bgwhite (talk) 17:34, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, weird attempt to use wikipedia for advertising a sale. --Soman (talk) 18:43, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as I was the editor who endorsed the PROD. Mz7 (talk) 21:29, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.