The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 00:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bent Leaf LLC

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I honestly have no idea whether or not this organization is notable. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 06:05, 29 January 2016 (UTC) And yes, I've googled the company. --I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 06:07, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Few changes made to the page. The deletion may be removed now. And Google search also shows the company. (Bonhishika (talk))

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 06:06, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 06:06, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Doesn't look particularly notable to me. --Quadraxis (talk) 02:37, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. I couldn't find any sources that meet the standards required of WP:RS (and hence WP:GNG). The sources provided in the article are either homepages to websites, or make one simple reference to the company itself - they don't provide in-depth coverage of the article subject at all. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:46, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I can confirm this is not a locally notable company, nothing else to suggest convincing better coverage and notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:14, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- Searches don't turn up enough to show that it passes either WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Insufficient coverage in WP:RS to meet WP:CORP. /wiae /tlk 14:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.