The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Anas ^talk? 20:49, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Weinberger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non notable actor Bigdaddy1981 23:09, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy - fails WP:BIO. Rklawton 23:16, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-- in a Wikipedia where no movie or TV-show goes unnoticed, poor Ben doesn't even have a blue-link to his credit. There's still law...Mandsford 00:36, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, right on the speedy line for me, but no real notability. --Dhartung | Talk 05:58, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Unfortunately, too minor an actor. His roles seem to be from 2000-2001, so he doesn't seem to have momentum working for him at this time. --Groggy Dice T | C 08:11, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Can the article name what roles he has had? Was he in starring roles or supporting, or even bit parts? Articles about actors and musicians must assert notability -- e.g., "Smith played Hamlet in the Shakespeare Company's 2002 production" or "Jones headlined at the Stratford Music Centre".... I have no way of knowing if this Ben Weinberger is notable or not. See WP:HOLE. Bearian 12:49, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• KEEP Wikipedia should be inclusive not exclusive. I am a firm believer that most bios should be allowed to remain. All bios need is sources and a minimal standard of notability. The larger Wikipedia is the best of a resource it is. One million articles is much better that one hundred thousand articles. It should be a source of information on the most trivial matters to the most important. Callelinea 04:51, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Okay, so you don't like our notability criteria, no need to prove a point by trying to impose your criteria on debates where we use the actual criteria. This user has been spamming several debates with this BTW. Morgan Wick 07:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 16:02, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• delete. this is his CV. Kripto 01:50, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I also think Wikipedia should be inclusive not exclusive, but not ad absurdum this is just the CV of a non-notable actor - lose it.Elmo 21:16, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.