The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (soft) slakr^\ talk / 02:52, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bay Weekly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Completely unsourced article about a weekly newspaper. As always, newspapers are not entitled to an automatic presumption of notability per WP:NMEDIA just because they exist; a newspaper must be the subject of reliable source coverage, in sources other than its own self-published content about itself, for a Wikipedia article to become earned. Article was already tagged for speedy, which was declined -- but while there is enough of a claim of notability here to preclude speedy, it isn't strong enough or sourced enough to actually make the article keepable. Bearcat (talk) 19:16, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Not enough coverage to prove notability. -- Dane ^talk 07:23, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.