The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Kungrat (1827) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is unreferenced. Although this is not a sufficient reason for deletion, the problem is that "Battle of Kungrat" returns zero hits on Google (including Books). In fact, there's no Wikipedia on either Kungrat, Oydustbiy (first belligerent) or Muhammad Yakub (second belligerent). Pichpich (talk) 16:56, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Pichpich (talk) 16:56, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I found nothing to support notability. There were zero hits on Google Scholar and Google Books. I was able to confirm only that there is a Kungrat in Uzbekistan but not the occurrence of a battle there on the date specified. I did not see evidence of an alternate spelling, but absent evidence of one turning up additional information, fails Wikipedia:GNG and Wikipedia:Notability (events). Jo7hs2 (talk) 17:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Agree, I also failed to find anything that would support this article or that the battle even happened. --hroest 18:19, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I’m fed up with made-up or wildly exaggerated Indian battles. Mccapra (talk) 19:34, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I've found the original source (or a clone of the original source) for the article here: [1]. Assuming the website is legitimate (whether or not it can be counted on to accurately represent specific facts), its existence suggests that the event is both real and notable, though it's possible this all ultimately comes from a citogenesis incident on Russian Wikipedia. I've tried a few different options for romanizing Ойдустбий and gotten nowhere. So: sources may exist, but there's currently no sign of any good ones - delete. -- asilvering (talk) 21:55, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment there is a single hit for Ойдустбий in Google Scholar that appears to at least mention Oydustbiy, but it’s discussing a campaign that started in 1809, so I don’t know if it’s the same campaign. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35163804 That was literally the only source I found and I can’t access the full text. Jo7hs2 (talk) 22:23, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong delete unsourced nonsense. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 00:53, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:10, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Also frustrated by this nonsense. We spend more time on them than the creator obviously did. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:53, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No references or sources support this article's notability. Hansen Sebastian^Talk 17:42, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No available sources to establish notability under WP:GNG. Shawn Teller (hy/hym) (talk) 14:12, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - really a no-brainer. I agree wholeheartedly with Mccapra.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:37, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.