The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was G7 Author requested deletion. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:12, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Bosworth Field/map (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a larger version of a map (using Template:Location Map and File:England in the UK - Northumberland outlined.svg) that appears in the article Battle of Bosworth Field. There are no subpages in article space; this also violates the subpages guideline, specifically fitting disallowed use 3: "Using subpages for permanent content that is meant to be part of the encyclopedia." I'm not sure if there's a more appropriate part of the Wiki this could be moved to, however. –Grondemar 22:31, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, go ahead and delete this. I don't think wikimedia has the capability to do what I was trying to do. Normally, when looking at an image, you can click it and it'll take you to the image page where you can possibly see a higher resolution version. However, since the image in this case isn't a real image but rather a generated image created by a template, clicking on the image doesn't show a higher resolution of the battle field complete with marks, it simply shows a blank map of England. I wanted to create a higher resolution version of the "image" (as displayed in the article, the one created by the template) on the article page, but in such a way that a person could click it and be taken to this page, where clicking the image would then take them to the blank England map file. However, when I tried to transclude this page in a sized and floated div on the main article page, it simply overran the boundaries I'd set out for it. I don't think what I wanted to do is possible at this time, so just delete it. If people want to see a higher resolution version, they can do what I did and copy/paste the template text on some other page. Banaticus (talk) 22:45, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note Already deleted per G7. NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 00:30, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.