The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BassMonster Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I declined a speedy for BassMonster Records, as the article makes a claim of notability as "one of the top dance labels in Norway". However, I am unable to verify this claim, I can find no reliable references that discuss the topic, (fails WP:GNG), and none of the artists are notable (fails WP:NMUSIC #5) - all blue links are to unrelated topics. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 16:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 16:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 16:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as a newly founded company of 2012 is unlikely to have better coverage to suggest convincing notability and there's nothing else noticeably better. SwisterTwister talk 19:16, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Can find virtually no reliable sources and has signed no notable artists. cyberdog958^Talk 08:39, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.