The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak Keep - Could be a notable article. It's new and could be given time to grow. If the logo were to be uploaded and included, along with a good, wikified base text, it'd be better off in terms of keep-ability. Anyone know what the prevailing precedent is for fire companies? Is there any sort of general, inherent consensus? This article has the potential for a decent-sized article and should be given the time to grow. (Geez, how can it be any less notable than fuzzy dice or vorpal or tar baby?) VigilancePrime (talk) 07:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Very narrow scope of notability and I doubt many people outside the area care about this fire company. Local fire stations do not need a page on wikipedia, unless they have some claim to fame or broad notability Corpx (talk) 09:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Bargo, New South Wales. The fire brigade is a major public service, but for a small community mainly of very local notability. Brigade appears to be already covered there. (Incidentally, the Bargo article is in need of some overhaul.) Sjakkalle(Check!)09:44, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.