The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:13, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bagio White

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lots of refs to other people and own web-site refs to himself but nothing independent and reliable about him. All this for an article that pops up ready-made, very well formatted and constructed from an editor on their very first edit. Some work has gone into this but it still fails WP:GNG by a mile Velella ^{Velella Talk} 19:55, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable graphic desginer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:37, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:37, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:34, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 21:48, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete insufficient independent coverage. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:56, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are exactly Zero independent references available which talk about a subject. A clear delete. I'm wondering of the magazine is notable as well. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:33, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete which in fact only goes to state the obvious and actual intentions of this article: PR, by both stating what his business is about and then his clients, that's not acceptable even if it was factual. SwisterTwister talk 06:40, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.