The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Babylon 5 media franchise#Novelizations. MBisanz ^talk 02:16, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Babylon 5: Accusations

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources online are advertisements and websites intending to sell the product. Fails WP:NBOOKS due to lack of significance and effect on anything, and fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:RS. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Non-notable. No third-party sources, and article is literally nothing but a recap of the story. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 05:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to parent article, Babylon 5 media franchise#Novelizations, as the best extant place to cover this novel, along with probably the rest of the novels mentioned in that article, which seem to mostly have their own articles now. Jclemens (talk) 07:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect because there are no serious needs for this to be deleted and this is obviously best connected to Babylon 5 itself. SwisterTwister talk 20:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.