The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:22, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Azeri style

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete : Very poorly sourced, contains many wrong informations. Also, even the cited sources don't support many of the claims. ---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:17, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:38, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:38, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:38, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:38, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:38, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The interwiki links are convincing enough that Arezi style is notable and sourceable. The article needs work but should stay. --Lockley (talk) 04:48, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Appears to be a genuine topic in the history of Iranian architecture, see e.g: [1], [2], [3]. Given the topic is real and arguably notable, flaws in the existing article are not a justification for deletion. SJK (talk) 06:02, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is an old architectural style and has reliable secondary sources.فرهنگ2016 (talk) 08:01, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.