The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 02:06, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Azavar Technologies Corporation

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:CORP. 2 gnews hits [1]. which are just 2 self published hits from prweb.com . looks like an WP:ADVERT. LibStar (talk) 11:52, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.

Speedy delete, unambiguous advertising. Yet another website design and development consulting firm advertising on Wikipedia: In addition to creating websites, Azavar offers online marketing, software training, custom content management systems, and technology integration with existing infrastructures.... Azavar coined the term Webability in order to define their vision and differentiate their capabilities. According to Azavar, Webability is “the talent to achieve great results using the power of the web.....” Azavar uses web application development and integration, creative design, managed network services, strategic consulting and online marketing to help their clients increase web traffic, sales leads, customer loyalty, and online purchases. Azavar considers these achievements Webability..... When Azavar created “Webability” in 1996, it was one of the first references to achieving measurable results by harnessing the power of the web. Today, interactive marketing campaigns utilize the goals and tactics of Webability. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:09, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nothing indicating notability.—Chowbok ☠ 17:39, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The gtest link above is too specific. I find this result fairly notable. Similarly a general google test indicates notability. This all goes along well with the many notable companies that they service. The article needs a lot of wikification, however.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 20:03, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

your new gnews search reveals just more prweb.com results which is an unreliable source. A google search does not indicate notability as per WP:GHITS. LibStar (talk) 22:35, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.